[Bucardo-general] Not able to specify internal db name

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
Fri Jul 8 02:43:16 UTC 2011

> There was a slight API change in B5 that should be documented better. 
> Basically, the "real" database name should be specified with 
> dbname=, not name=. The name= is a bit of backwards compatibility 
> that should probably be removed at some point.

Removed: using --name should give you an error now, and point you 
to --dbname instead. All of this was done to make the 'add' commands 
consistent, such that the first argument was always the internal name 
of the thing to add.

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20110707/0e278a03/attachment.bin 

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list