[Bucardo-general] Not able to specify internal db name

[Greg Sabino Mullane]

> There was a slight API change in B5 that should be documented better. 
> Basically, the "real" database name should be specified with 
> dbname=, not name=. The name= is a bit of backwards compatibility 
> that should probably be removed at some point.

Removed: using --name should give you an error now, and point you 
to --dbname instead. All of this was done to make the 'add' commands 
consistent, such that the first argument was always the internal name 
of the thing to add.

-- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20110707/0e278a03/attachment.bin