[Bucardo-general] Question about Bucardo

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
Fri Jul 8 02:48:42 UTC 2011

On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 10:23:21PM +0200, Elso wrote:
> Hello,
> first would i say: great tool!I am currently testing the new version 
> 5.0. So far, I couldn´t find bugs with the replication!
> Now to my question: Is there a reason why the constraint "db_name_sane" 
> in table "db" no dots allowed?
> E.g. i use the domain name as database name! Could I extend the 
> constraint with dot, without causing a bug?

I don't think that would cause an issue. It's mostly there just to 
keep things looking sane in the log output, as we sometimes show 
things like "$dbname.$schema.$table". But as far as I can tell 
no code will actually break. Let us know if it works, and maybe we'll 
change that constraint.

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20110707/09fe2452/attachment.bin 

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list