[Bucardo-general] Should Bucardo Treat Deadlocks as Serialization Failures?

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
Sat Nov 3 19:06:01 UTC 2012

> Kevin Grittner tells me via email that he considers deadlocks 
> to also be serialization failures. Currently, it looks like Bucardo 
> errors out on a deadlock failure. I’m wondering if we shouldn’t 
> change it to use exactly the same model as a serialization failure: 
> sleep and try again. Thoughts?

Makes sense to me. I implemented it just now in 0406ecb5993793b59fa84815c2b0384979c862b4 
but kept it as a separate knob, kid_deadlock_sleep, just in case.

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20121103/9d015daf/attachment.sig>

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list