[Bucardo-general] Connection Pooling

[David E. Wheeler]

On Oct 2, 2012, at 9:45 PM, Rosser Schwarz <rosser.schwarz at gmail.com> wrote:

>>> Which type of pooling should I use: transaction or statement?
>> Certainly not statement! And be careful with transaction as well.
> 
> Doesn't pgBouncer also support session-level pooling?  Would that be
> more appropriate?

Maybe. I am not clear what would be the advantage of using pgBouncer session pooling for persistent connections, such as those maintained by Bucardo. If a connection is permanent, it can hardly be shared across pool, can it?

Best,

David
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4358 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20121002/92b105e5/attachment.p7s>