[Bucardo-general] End the Cutesy

[Greg Sabino Mullane]

(Way too busy this week to reply to everything yet, but keep the 
questions and bug reports and patches coming!)

+1 for changing the names. Note that this has already partly happened: we 
encourage people to do 'bucardo add table..' now instead of 'bucardo add goat..'.
Not 100% sure I like relation. It's a pretty obscure term for non-db-theory 
folk, and Postgres doesn't push it very heavy on casual users. I also don't 
want to paint ourselves into a corner in case we end up replicating something 
someday that is not what Postgres considers a relation. But perhaps it's 
not important anyway, if we keep it semi-hidden and just let people use 
'table', 'sequence', 'view', etc.

> Change "herd" to "relgroup"

This is the part that really undoes the above, however. I think relgroup 
does make the most sense, or at least XXgroup. Or even just 'group'.
Feel free to make the change, if you want, I don't think I will come 
up with better terms and if I do, I have a commit bit as well. :)

-- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20121017/5c0dd9ec/attachment.sig>