[Bucardo-general] Two masters, replication works but only one of the triggers fire

Torbjørn Kristoffersen tk at mezzanineware.com
Fri Aug 30 14:29:58 UTC 2013

I have a problem with Bucardo (latest stable) - I have a table "person"
that has a trigger, updating a table called "archive" on insert/update.

This works fine, except when person table is replicated with Bucardo (two
masters, with standard conflict set to 'latest').

The trigger only seems to fire on the DB where the change was initially
performed, but the trigger is always ignored on the other database.

The data in "person" is however replicated perfectly.

Unfortunately it's absolutely necessary that both triggers fire. Is this
perhaps a bug?  It seems like a common requirement.

PS - if it matters, the trigger adds a row to a table that is not in the
goat table.  It's a table that is kept outside of replication.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20130830/df582428/attachment.html>

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list