[Bucardo-general] Multi-master / random off- and online

[Greg Sabino Mullane]

On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 05:15:42AM -0800, Chris Keane wrote:
> Thanks Greg. Would the appropriate approach to implement this be to
> set up each mobile database with it's own set of uniquely named
> syncs that just includes itself and the central database?

Yes.

> Can each single table on the central database participate in 
> multiple syncs without problem?

Yes

> Do you think there would be much of a performance impact on the central 
> server if each table ended up with a few hundred extra 
> bucardo_kick_% triggers?

Probably not a huge one, but those might not need to be there anyway: you 
can switch to a timed strategy which might be better considering that 
only a certain % of the syncs will actually be "active" at any given time.

We could also look into combining all the triggerkicks into a single 
function. Right now it's more of a conveinence than anything - there 
is reason we couldn't have a single trigger fire off X number of 
notices rather than X triggers firing a single notice. Perhaps a TODO 
item.

-- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20130124/28e5b774/attachment.sig>