[Bucardo-general] test suite broken on git HEAD?

[Antoine Pitrou]

Hello,

I'm new to Bucardo and I'm trying to evaluate it. When running the test
suite on a fresh git clone I get errors on 10-fullcopy.t:

$ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00-release.t ............... skipped: Test skipped unless environment variable RELEASE_TESTING is set
t/01-basic.t ................. ok     
t/02-bctl-customname.t ....... ok     
t/02-bctl-db.t ............... ok     
t/02-bctl-dbg.t .............. ok     
t/02-bctl-herd.t ............. ok   
t/02-bctl-sync.t ............. ok   
t/02-bctl-table.t ............ ok     
t/10-fullcopy.t .............. 45/81 
#   Failed test '(fullcopy) B.Bucardo_test3      copy ok (BIGINT) [line: 103]'
#   at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x32184c8)
#     $expected->[1] = Does not exist

#   Failed test '(fullcopy) B.bucardo space test copy ok (INT) [line: 103]'
#   at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x3218120)
#     $expected->[1] = Does not exist

#   Failed test '(fullcopy) B.bucardo_test1      copy ok (SMALLINT) [line: 103]'
#   at t/10-fullcopy.t line 103.
#     Structures begin differing at:
#          $got->[1] = ARRAY(0x3218468)
#     $expected->[1] = Does not exist

[lots of similar failures snipped]

The Bucardo-4.99.7 test suite works fine in the same context. Should I
stick to Bucardo-4.99.7 for evaluation purposes or is HEAD actually
safe?

Thanks

Antoine.