[Bucardo-general] Status on Multi-Column Primary Key Support
bsa at lanl.gov
Wed Nov 14 19:10:53 UTC 2007
How goes the implementation of mutl-colum pkey support? Anything you
would like me to test?
On Oct 28, 2007, at 7:28 PM, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> Ben Simon wrote:
>> Would 2 be any harder to validate on insert/update then 3?
> No, number two would actually be the easiest to both write and parse.
> I think a pipe seems a valid separator, perhaps we could even make an
> exception (such as double pipes) for people that really want to have
> pipes in their column names.
> Jon Jensen wrote:
>> Yeah, I think #2 is the best of the lot as well. None of them are
>> "satisfying" exactly, but that's life.
>> By the way, will #2 make working with column names that need
>> quoting any
>> harder? Such as mixed case names, or names with spaces? Does
>> Bucardo even
>> work with such names right now?
> It does not work with spaces, but should work with mixed case. Either
> way, I'll make sure they are both supported and tested when I am
> up the new way, as I'll have to touch all of that code anyway. :)
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
> End Point Corporation 610-983-9073
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bucardo-general