[Bucardo-general] Bucardo question
goran.gugic at gmail.com
Sun Dec 6 16:45:44 UTC 2009
The answer is yes and no. :)
Replication can get pretty complex pretty quickly and there are many caveats
- I would say that it might not even be realistic to have fully automatic
replication (for all exceptions - database crashes, application errors and
bugs, duplicate keys and ref integrity violations, connection errors,
Extra shell code is strictly speaking not necessary for asynchronous
multi-master replication as long as there are no exceptions.
It might be necessary if you get into trouble (broken connections during
replication) or you might opt to fix things semi automatically (by managing
the bucardo manually, just to illustrate what I mean - there is a
onetimecopy field in sync table with which you can tell bucardo to catch-up,
or actually to replicate everything from master to the slave once things are
fixed - this is strictly speaking no extra shell code, but require you to
modify bucardo settings restart it, etc...)
Wiki might seem confusing, however you really should read it until all of
the concepts are clear - and preferably until all of it is clear (all of the
pages on http://bucardo.org/wiki/Category:Bucardo, and of course don't
forget to read install and readme)
Installing and running the tests during the install would be the first step
(the tests might not run on debian based distributions if you use standard
postgres package due to debian organizing postgre databases into clusters)
I'll cc this answer to bucardo-general so that people who know more than me
Actualy, now that this is on the list, a questio: is the removal of links to
http://bucardo.org/bucardo.html deliberate? I found that document to be
really nice introduction to the system with no equivalent in current wiki.
On Sun, Dec 6, 2009 at 1:10 PM, Женя Деревянкин <jekader at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, Goran!
> I've seen your posts on the Bucardo mailing list, and you seem to have
> the same scenario I do - I need to set up a few equally important DB
> servers, that should have all the data in sync.
> Could you please tell me if that can be acheived using Bucardo, since
> their wiki is not working properly, and I can't get the whole picture
> from there.
> If it is possible, does it work out of the box, or requires extra
> shellcode? I need all the servers to exchange data updates, and if one
> fails, after recovery it should be filled with data from the remaining
> Thanks in advance, and sorry for disturbing.
> Best regards,
> Eugen Derevyankin
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bucardo-general