[Bucardo-general] My locks overfloweth

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
Mon Apr 15 15:28:14 UTC 2013

On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:27:04AM -0400, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 11:07:21AM -0400, Mitchell Perilstein wrote:
> > Hi Greg,   We haven't tried that isolation level yet but we were
> > using our preferred 'read uncommitted' for a while (yes we know it's
> > supposed to be the same as 'read committed' in pg) and that didn't
> > seem to affect the lock usage or the memory complaints versus
> > serializable.
> Hmmm... I think I meant "repeatable read". I need to revisit this 
> when my brain is not fuzzy. I don't think we should have 
> read_committed or read_uncommitted in there at all!

Yeah, sorry - it should always be set to repeatable read or serializable. 
Where are you setting it to read uncommitted?

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20130415/e2a22a75/attachment.sig>

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list