[Bucardo-general] Failed validation

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
Sun Aug 24 15:14:36 UTC 2014

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 02:37:53AM +0100, Michelle Sullivan wrote:

Following up on this old thread...

> +                       ($scol->{ftype} =~ /^character varying\((\d+)\)/
> and $fcol->{ftype} =~ /^character varying\((\d+)\)/ and $1 > $2)

Seems a little off, but it shouldn't hurt as long as we are checking 
sources and targets. We need to make sure the second one is not a 
source, or it could break things.

> ..The bug (two fold) was that the validate returned 'OK' when it clearly
> isn't... not to mention that a reload returns 'Not Active' in the log
> and just hangs on the command line...
> ..and, one would think that extra cols (when 'strict_checking' is false)
> would not fail the sync...  The log shows 'Warning' which would suggest
> the same... Perhaps 'Error' would be more appropriate...?

I don't have the tuits for this right now, but it would be great if 
someone could make this into an official github issue.

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20140824/93763c60/attachment.sig>

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list