[Bucardo-general] Bucardo 5.1.1 bucardo_purge_delta for Cascaded Slave

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
Sat Nov 1 00:17:11 UTC 2014

On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 05:28:40PM +0700, Abdul Yadi wrote:
> Table A (master) => Table B (slave) => Table C (cascaded slave)
> Every change on A replicated to B then to C.
> After a while, VAC successfully clean delta and track tables on A, but not
> on B.
Well that definitely needs to be fixed, thanks for the report.

> I managed to fix it by modify filter from [HAVING COUNT(*)=] to [HAVING
> COUNT(*)>=], as follows:

That will solve your exact case, but I'm not sure it's a good solution 
overall. I will ponder this. :)

Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20141031/e92595f8/attachment.sig>

More information about the Bucardo-general mailing list