[Bucardo-general] bucardo doesn't sync tables without any error

[Maryam Rabiee]

Why did you remove the onetimecopy option in Bucardo 5? How should we
handle changes during copy?[It's a master slave replication]

On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 12:12 PM, Maryam Rabiee <rabiei.maryam at gmail.com>
wrote:

> As I mentioned it's 5.3.1. If onetimecopy is not working yet for Bucardo5
> , why is it in the help for add sync command ? why isn't there any record
> of type in options for syncs? Fullcopy syncs aren'r available in Bucardo5?
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 7:30 AM, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg at endpoint.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 07:19:07PM +0430, Maryam Rabiee wrote:
>> > I'm currently using bucardo 5.3.1 , I added a sync with option
>> > onetimecopy=1 but the problem is the tables aren't replicated in the
>> slave.
>> > There are no errors in the log file and also no copies or deletes,  but
>> > when I check the status of the sync the Current State field is "DELETE
>> > public.tableX" . This table is empty in the slave and the state doesn't
>> > change.
>> > What should I do to find the problem or make Bucardo start syncing?
>>
>> What version of Bucardo is this?
>>
>> onetimecopy is not working yet for Bucardo5, you will need to do a
>> manual copy of the data, or "touch" all the rows on the source.
>>
>> --
>> Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
>> End Point Corporation
>> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20150819/c50ba805/attachment.html>