[check_postgres] please put version back into download tarball name
Greg Sabino Mullane
greg at endpoint.com
Wed Jan 25 16:33:27 UTC 2012
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Jon Jensen wrote:
> Hi, Peter. I agree -- it would be nicer to have the version number in the
> file name. Greg, you've been doing the releases. Is there any reason we
> can't go back to having the version number?
That's fine with me. I think I did that so as to not have a canonical
URI that always has the latest and greatest. But I am totally fine
with going back to explicit versions.
> Good idea. I made that directory browsable.
>
> And there I see an old/ directory that I think should have its contents
> moved up with the other files -- otherwise, they're not all together and
> the URLs aren't stable from when they were released. Any objections?
Also fine with me.
> Also, does anyone know why we have unpacked Bucardo-4.4.{6,7} directories
> there? Seems odd.
Not sure: feel free to remove them. They are easily recreated if needed.
--
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/check_postgres/attachments/20120125/c711d5da/attachment.bin
More information about the Check_postgres
mailing list