[check_postgres] please put version back into download tarball name

[Greg Sabino Mullane]

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:23:29PM -0700, Jon Jensen wrote:
> Hi, Peter. I agree -- it would be nicer to have the version number in the 
> file name. Greg, you've been doing the releases. Is there any reason we 
> can't go back to having the version number?

That's fine with me. I think I did that so as to not have a canonical 
URI that always has the latest and greatest. But I am totally fine 
with going back to explicit versions.

> Good idea. I made that directory browsable.
> 
> And there I see an old/ directory that I think should have its contents 
> moved up with the other files -- otherwise, they're not all together and 
> the URLs aren't stable from when they were released. Any objections?

Also fine with me.

> Also, does anyone know why we have unpacked Bucardo-4.4.{6,7} directories 
> there? Seems odd.

Not sure: feel free to remove them. They are easily recreated if needed.

-- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/check_postgres/attachments/20120125/c711d5da/attachment.bin