[Bucardo-general] Can bucardo do this?

[eric machine]

Hi Josh,

Is there a v5? I though the latest was v4.99.7?

1 more question.

Let's say I have these schemas now

HQ
- 300 tables

Branch
- 300 tables

For the start, both HQ and branch have the same database schemas (identical 300 tables).

If one day I plan to add 10 more tables to HQ e.g.

HQ
- 310 tables

Branch
- 300 tables

Is it possible when I use bucardo to sync from HQ to Branch, it will auto create the missing 10 tables for Branch?

Any help? Thanks.

> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:42:45 -0600
> From: josh at endpoint.com
> To: eric.machine at hotmail.com
> CC: bucardo-general at bucardo.org
> Subject: Re: [Bucardo-general] Can bucardo do this?
> 
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 01:19:28AM +0000, eric machine wrote:
> >    Basically branch can only sync to HQ, not the other way around
> 
> Sure, Bucardo is fine for that.
> 
> >    If I sync, can I exclude any tables or even specific conditions per
> >    table?
> 
> You can tell Bucardo to ignore certain tables, and you can use what's called a
> "customselect" to replicate only certain records from a particular table.
> 
> >    The problem with rubyreps, some tables have table constraints will
> >    cause issue. I hope bucardo will work better though.
> 
> Bucardo's pretty good at working around table constraint problems.
> 
> >    I really hope the latest 4.99.7 is stable use for production.
> 
> I'd try Bucardo 5. It's pretty stable, and should be fine for your purposes.
> 
> -- 
> Josh Tolley   josh at endpoint.com   801-987-0252
> End Point Corporation  http://www.endpoint.com
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20130821/8ac4c6f8/attachment.html>