[Bucardo-general] Can bucardo do this?
eric.machine at hotmail.com
Thu Aug 22 08:27:04 UTC 2013
Thanks for the kind reply.
I need some help here.
Failed to add sync: DBD::Pg::st execute failed: ERROR: Table "public.ir_model_relation" must specify a primary key! at line 117. at line 30.CONTEXT: PL/Perl function "validate_sync" at /usr/local/bin/bucardo line 3885.
Weird? In rubyreps, I can actually temporarily create a virtual primary key (which doesn't impact changes to the actual table)
config.include_tables 'ir_model_constraint', :key => ['id']
Is there any way which I can achieve with bucardo?
I am using an existing open source system. Thus changing their design is really a bad idea, after all there are total of 60 out of 400 tables which have no primary keys.
Any help? Thanks.
> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 21:17:20 -0600
> From: josh at endpoint.com
> To: rosser.schwarz at gmail.com
> CC: eric.machine at hotmail.com; bucardo-general at bucardo.org
> Subject: Re: [Bucardo-general] Can bucardo do this?
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 06:24:12PM -0700, Rosser Schwarz wrote:
> > As for your question about Bucardo's stability, there are people using
> > 4.99.x in production right now. There's always the possibility of
> > as-yet undiscovered bugs it is a beta release, after all but it hasn't
> > eaten anyone's data yet that I'm aware of...
> Even if it weren't called a beta release, there's a possibility of finding
> as-yet undiscovered bugs </pedant> But Rosser is certainly right. 4.99 is in
> use in quite a few places, and your description doesn't suggest you'll be
> doing anything that would tax Bucardo especially.
> Josh Tolley josh at endpoint.com 801-987-0252
> End Point Corporation http://www.endpoint.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Bucardo-general