[Bucardo-general] Suggestion - help issue

[Greg Sabino Mullane]

On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 05:03:04PM +0000, bruno quintana wrote:
> I have been trying the new Bucardo version (5.2) and it is great, however I
> was expecting this issue would be resolved, but it wasn't :(
[ issue of one database own bringing down everything else]
...
> this issue could eventually be fixed by doing something like "bucardo start
> --ignore-databases-down=yes" and the only thing this flag will do is if the
> connection throws an error, ignore that server and save somewhere that this
> server was down and every I don't know maybe 5 customisable minutes, try if
> that server comes up and if it does then replicate the queue that was
> created while that server was down.

We are actively working on solving this problem. Currently, a downed database 
*should* be deteted by Bucardo, and the sync deactivated, without stopping 
any other syncs (unless they are also using that database). Work is underway 
to allow syncs to continue even if a database within it is down, but 
that's a trickier problem.

-- 
Greg Sabino Mullane greg at endpoint.com
End Point Corporation
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 163 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <https://mail.endcrypt.com/pipermail/bucardo-general/attachments/20141214/7aaf6027/attachment-0001.sig>